Baxter and Montgomery developed this in 1988 and a general explanation of the relational dialectics theory is when communication parties experience internal, conflicting pulls which causes relationships to be in a constant state of flux, also referred to as dialectical tension. The pressure these tensions cause can occur in a wavelike pattern over time. Relational dialectics introduces the concept that the closer a person becomes to another, the more likely conflict will come up and potentially “tear them apart”. There are three main relational dialectics:
- Connectedness and Separateness – although we desire a close and permanent connection in interpersonal relationships, no relationship can last unless both individuals spend “me” time –> too much time together can end up in losing who you really are.
- Certainty and Uncertainty – Partners need to be reassured in their interpersonal relationship –> without variety in things such as spontaneity they can become boring however.
- Openness and Closedness – In interpersonal relationship, partners feel pressured to communicate really personal information –> this counters our natural desire for privacy and the struggle is a good representation of intimacy in relationships that’s not a straight path.
- An example I can also easily relate to is my own relationship with my man-friend. We illustrate the relational dialectic of connectedness and separateness in a very clear manner because of the time we spend apart. During the week, he focuses on work and I’m focusing on school and my other activities so we just naturally don’t have the time to see each other. However, when it comes to the weekend we fulfill that “closeness” and make sure to spend at least a full day or two together without any work or other plans getting in the way. I feel like this really works for both since we’re doing such different things it would strain our relationship if we were to constantly be in each other’s space.






